[Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

Hans De Kryger hans.dekryger13 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 11 06:45:24 UTC 2016


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport#Route

Is version 2?

*Regards,*

*Hans*

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Hans De Kryger <hans.dekryger13 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Jo,
>
> Is there agreement on the forward/backward roles in PT2? By that i mean
> completely phasing them out. Or is it still an open discussion?‚Äč I won't
> add them anymore if the point is to phase them out.
>
> *Regards,*
>
> *Hans*
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> The semantics depend on public_transport:version.
>>
>> If 1 then yes.
>> If 2 there should be no forward/backward roles anymore.
>>
>> Instead you add an ordered sequence of ways that is continuous.
>>
>> If you want a demo of how to map PT, we can do a hangout.
>>
>> Also, have a look at this:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Polyglot/diary/38980#comment35201
>>
>> Mapping public transport should become a lot more convenient by the time
>> that GSoC project finishes.
>>
>> Polyglot
>>
>> 2016-07-11 10:08 GMT+04:00 Hans De Kryger <hans.dekryger13 at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> If i remove the forward/backward tag on a section of a way (part of the
>>> bus route) does that signify the bus goes both ways?
>>>
>>> *Regards,*
>>>
>>> *Hans*
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20160710/e648cb96/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list