daniel at xn--ko-wla.pl
Fri Jul 22 21:48:59 UTC 2016
W dniu 19.07.2016 12:50, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
> 2016-07-18 22:13 GMT+02:00 Daniel Koć <daniel at koć.pl>:
>> It is already used a bit (among other, more popular types):
>> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/attraction=yes 
> Thank you for pointing to taginfo, indeed attraction is already used
> for individual features of theme parks and playgrounds.
> That's why "tourist_attraction" might be a better choice to replace
> tourim=attraction. It's not in use currently. Any comments on that?
Why not use simply attraction=yes? Do you suppose it has some other
meaning than we try to describe?
"Low, low, low..." [M. Kempa]
More information about the Tagging