[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - learner driver

Anders Fougner anders.fougner at gmail.com
Fri Jun 24 08:06:12 UTC 2016

Off topic:
In my opinion, that's how *all* access tags should have been. It's incredibly many who don't know that bicycle=yes/no/whatever is an access tag and not a "route choice opinion" or something like that. So they put bicycle=no if they don't think it fits their commute bike... 
Access:bicycle would be far less ambiguous. 


Den 24. juni 2016 09.40.59 CEST, skrev Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
>sent from a phone
>> Il giorno 24 giu 2016, alle ore 00:24, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com>
>ha scritto:
>> Does not make human sense. 
>> Might be better tagged access:learner_driver=no/yes ? This clearly
>identifies it as an access function.
>while this is not in line with the rest of the access tags, I admit it
>was my first thought as well. Makes it clearer.
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20160624/4c5f9d23/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list