[Tagging] Proposal about suffixed tags has been approved

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Thu Mar 3 06:42:19 UTC 2016

sent from a phone

> Am 03.03.2016 um 03:57 schrieb moltonel 3x Combo <moltonel at gmail.com>:
> The fact that we don't know wether the extra name is an old_name or a
> loc_name or something else is independant of how the extra name was
> taged. The information is equally lacking from name_1, name=x;y, and
> alt_name. Do not shoot the name_1 messenger when it is just telling
> you that the mapper didn't have nuanced information about which
> context the extra name fits best in.

didn't you say before, name_n was for equally valid names? How do you distinguish names that are confirmed to be equally valid and bearing the same semantics from names where they are possibly not but the mapper didn't know?


More information about the Tagging mailing list