[Tagging] sloped_curb, kerb and god knows what left in limbo ......

Simon Poole simon at poole.ch
Mon Mar 7 19:48:35 UTC 2016

Recently I believe in this case was 2010 .


Am 07.03.2016 um 19:39 schrieb Andy Mabbett:
> On 2 March 2016 at 16:42, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:
>> While the abandoned proposal seems to be more complete and I can't say
>> anything about the other variant because of the lacking documentation, I
>> don't really care either way, it would simply make easier if we could
>> come to some consensus on what the actual current state is and what the
>> preferred tagging is.
> I notice that two pages have recently been marked as "deprecated", in favour of:
>    http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:kerb
> I find the latter unhelpful; it assumes that all wheelchairs are the
> same, and seems to leave no way to say that a kerb is "dropped" (using
> whatever term may be preferred), if the editor does not know which
> /type/ of dropped kerb it is.
> I would prefer, say:
>     kerb=dropped
>     dropped-kerb=rolled
> instead of, say:
>     kerb=rolled
> since the former allows the use of:
>      kerb=dropped
> alone.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20160307/bb7b142a/attachment.sig>

More information about the Tagging mailing list