[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - scheduled lifecycle value

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> Il giorno 16 mag 2016, alle ore 19:22, Joachim <noreply at freedom-x.de> ha scritto:
> 
> But planned has too few semantic differences compared to proposed and for many does not include secured funding.


how "secure" must secured funding be? Just because money is reserved/foreseen to build something doesn't mean it will be spent in all cases, and that it is sufficient to complete the construction. Shall we evaluate the probability that the entity giving the money could default? I believe yet another intermediate level for planning and construction states will not change the situation significantly.

cheers,
Martin