[Tagging] Should greenhouse et al have building=yes? (was building=digester)

[Marc Gemis]

I see, but the extra building is probably caused by the fact that a
man_made area is not rendered in many cases. (which was also mentioned
by traveling_salesman during the discussion why added
building=digester

Is building=yes a good addition,  or should we add building=windmill
to man_made=windmill.
In which case we repeat the same information. What do you think ?

regards

m

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Andy Townsend <ajt1047 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21/05/2016 06:37, Marc Gemis wrote:
>>
>> No, I wouldn't expect that, but I would expect e.g. windmill,
>> watermill and lighthouse to be displayed as building as well. I
>> couldn't find those in your style. I'm talking about mills where work
>> and living are often combined into one. Maybe this is a country
>> specific view ?
>
>
> When I looked at the data (in the UK) those items either already had
> building=yes tagged on them or were just mapped as nodes (where a building
> tag is essentially irrelevant for rendering).
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging