[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - scheduled lifecycle value

[Joachim]

2016-05-17 10:22 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
> how "secure" must secured funding be? Just because money is reserved/foreseen to build something doesn't mean it will be spent in all cases, and that it is sufficient to complete the construction. Shall we evaluate the probability that the entity giving the money could default? I believe yet another intermediate level for planning and construction states will not change the situation significantly.

No, unforeseen events don't have to be considered. If a already
started construction is not finished it will already be in lifecycle
construction:.
What do you mean by "yet another" level? At the moment there is only
proposed and construction, planned is considered the same as proposed.