[Tagging] Typo fix for tunnel=building_passage and how to proceed in the future
LeTopographeFou
letopographefou at gmail.com
Sat Sep 10 12:21:46 UTC 2016
By the way the subject of the mail was "Typo fix for
tunnel=building_passage and how to proceed in the future" and not a
discussion on which tag to choose, so I restore it to not confuse
people. Please don't associate with my question something else ;-) .
Yours,
LeTopographeFou
Le 10/09/2016 à 13:35, LeTopographeFou a écrit :
>
> Thank you for your feedback.
>
> This is an important topic but I think that fixing a typo and
> approving a tag are two different needs. Whether this tag is validated
> or not, I think it should be fixed because the intent of those
> contributors was to put building_passage and not those fancy
> variations, even if they are wrong. It can also help to highlight
> errors in some tools.
>
> Yours,
>
> LeTopographeFou
> Le 10/09/2016 à 13:23, Simone Saviolo a écrit :
>> Yes, an obvious one: a building_passage *goes through a building* :)
>>
>> Semantically it is quite important to distinguish between a
>> colonnade/arcade and a building passage (BTW, also arcades and
>> colonnades have their own tag). covered=yes just implies that the
>> building is over the highway, but it might even mean that a
>> protruding balcony "covers" the way.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Simone
>>
>> 2016-09-10 13:09 GMT+02:00 Dave F <davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
>> <mailto:davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com>>:
>>
>> Hmm...
>> The building_passage tag (65 445) is a new one to me.
>> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tunnel=building_passage
>> <http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tunnel=building_passage>
>>
>> Looking at the wiki it's very similar to covered=yes (254 624)
>> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/covered
>> <http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/covered>
>>
>> I thought there was a discussion here where it was agreed to be a
>> tunnel it would need to be below natural ground (ie a mountain or
>> river bed).
>> These 'building_passage' all appear to be at ground level.
>>
>> Is there a difference I'm not aware of?
>>
>> Dave F.
>>
>> On 10/09/2016 11:42, LeTopographeFou wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've noticed several typo errors in tag values. I would like to
>>> fix them when it is obvious. When they all came from one user,
>>> it's easy to contact him and agree on a fix. When it's worldwide
>>> and multi contributors it becomes difficult to identify the
>>> right contributor for each tag and contact them one by one
>>> (unless there is a tool to say "this value for this key of
>>> this/those object(s) have been assigned by Xxx, Yyy..."). In all
>>> cases I want to document the edit in the wiki. But do I have to
>>> ask for a vote/discussion for automated typo edits? The wiki is
>>> unclear on this point.
>>>
>>> So I've made a proposal here for a first edit:
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23002_-_Typos_with_tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage
>>> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23002_-_Typos_with_tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your feedback
>>>
>>> * vote is ok
>>> * don't worry, document and do when it's obvious
>>> * edit one by one/contact authors one by one
>>> * do nothing and let the time do his work
>>> * are you silly? automated edits are evil for typos!
>>> * ... ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>> --
>>> LeTopographeFou
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>> _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing
>> list Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20160910/4d894488/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list