[Tagging] tunnel=building_passage or covered=yes

[Richard]

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:46:36AM +0100, Dave F wrote:
> But it's *not a tunnel*

that makes 2 votes for covered=building_passage and phasing out
tunnel=building_passage

Richard

> 
> On 10/09/2016 12:23, Simone Saviolo wrote:
> >Yes, an obvious one: a building_passage *goes through a building* :)
> >
> >Semantically it is quite important to distinguish between a
> >colonnade/arcade and a building passage (BTW, also arcades and colonnades
> >have their own tag). covered=yes just implies that the building is over
> >the highway, but it might even mean that a protruding balcony "covers" the
> >way.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Simone
> >
> >2016-09-10 13:09 GMT+02:00 Dave F <davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
> ><mailto:davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com>>:
> >
> >    Hmm...
> >    The building_passage tag (65 445) is a new one to me.
> >    http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tunnel=building_passage
> >    <http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tunnel=building_passage>
> >
> >    Looking at the wiki it's very similar to covered=yes (254 624)
> >    http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/covered
> >    <http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/covered>
> >
> >    I thought there was a discussion here where it was agreed to be a
> >    tunnel it would need to be below natural ground (ie a mountain or
> >    river bed).
> >    These 'building_passage' all appear to be at ground level.
> >
> >    Is there a difference I'm not aware of?
> >
> >    Dave F.
> >
> >    On 10/09/2016 11:42, LeTopographeFou wrote:
> >>
> >>    Hello,
> >>
> >>    I've noticed several typo errors in tag values. I would like to
> >>    fix them when it is obvious. When they all came from one user,
> >>    it's easy to contact him and agree on a fix. When it's worldwide
> >>    and multi contributors it becomes difficult to identify the right
> >>    contributor for each tag and contact them one by one (unless
> >>    there is a tool to say "this value for this key of this/those
> >>    object(s) have been assigned by Xxx, Yyy..."). In all cases I
> >>    want to document the edit in the wiki. But do I have to ask for a
> >>    vote/discussion for automated typo edits? The wiki is unclear on
> >>    this point.
> >>
> >>    So I've made a proposal here for a first edit:
> >>    http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23002_-_Typos_with_tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage
> >>    <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23002_-_Typos_with_tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage>
> >>
> >>    Thank you for your feedback
> >>
> >>      * vote is ok
> >>      * don't worry, document and do when it's obvious
> >>      * edit one by one/contact authors one by one
> >>      * do nothing and let the time do his work
> >>      * are you silly? automated edits are evil for typos!
> >>      * ... ?
> >>
> >>
> >>    Yours,
> >>    --     LeTopographeFou
> >>
> >>
> >>    _______________________________________________
> >>    Tagging mailing list
> >>    Tagging at openstreetmap.org  <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> >>    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging  <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
> >
> >
> >    _______________________________________________
> >    Tagging mailing list
> >    Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> >    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >    <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Tagging mailing list
> >Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 

> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging