[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 3))

[Viking]

> check_date tag is very imprecise. some use it to indicate when they checked the object on the ground without knowing what was checked. 
> others use it to check the date of objects under construction in external sources without verification of the ground.
> I had proposed that we use operational_status:date which has the merit of making it clear that we are want to have the functional test. But this tag is not specific to hydrants, I'm not sure it should be added in the proposal of hydrants.
> I wrote to the author of the proposal operational_status but I did not get an answer. I will ask again and if it does not answer, I will propose to take over the proposal separately from the hydrants.
>What do you think about ?

Ok, let us know about it.


> another think : imho we should remove name as "usefull combination".

+1 I do it, it is a residual of original wiki page.


> also we should remove fire_hydrant:count=* as "usefull combination"

+1 I do it, it is a residual of original wiki page.


Best regards
Alberto


---
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus