[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carport

[Yves]

I think here that no comment means not controversial,  you should move away the page from proposal to document an established tag and that's it. 
Yves 

Le 4 février 2017 18:56:29 GMT+01:00, Joachim <noreply at freedom-x.de> a écrit :
>This is the second RfC since the first one got no comments
>(https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-September/030292.html).
>
>The tag building=carport is used for one carport building. The carport
>might provide more than one parking space. It is not necessary that
>the carport is currently used for vehicle parking, the tag only
>describes the building type.
>
>A carport is distinctive enough from building=garage and building=roof
>so that an own tag should be used. The plural (like building=garages)
>is not defined since all wide carports I could find can be classified
>as one structure. The key building=* is used since a carport is a type
>of building=roof.
>
>Add amenity=parking/motorcycle_parking/bicycle_parking +
>building=carports to mark the parking facility. If there are multiple
>carports at a parking site add the tags to an area surrounding them.
>These tags are usually not necessary for private parking.
>
>There are already 2 183 ways tagged with building=carport.
>
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/carport_buildings
>
>Regards Joachim
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-- 
Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170204/4fb23edf/attachment.html>