[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - CoreIndoor
zbytovsky at gmail.com
Wed Feb 8 09:16:27 UTC 2017
Thanks for feedback, still I dont get the meaing of your first sentence,
ad way too big) could you suggest proper partitioning? Its not about new
tags, just through explanation of cases for level=*
ad level=-1-8) It means -1 to 8. This is already well established and not
matter for discussion.
btw, I suggested only modifications to "accepted Simple Indoor Tagging" --
is it ok? Or should I create a complete self-explanatory proposal?
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:02 AM Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> Err 60 seconds and ..
> Way too big ... as in too many things in the one proposal.
> I would break it up into the individual keys.
> The layer=-1-8 .. confusing .. is that -1 to -8 or -1 to 8 ?
> On 08-Feb-17 07:09 PM, Pavel Zbytovský wrote:
> I have some points about indoor mapping. There is already an established
> tagging scheme - the Simple Indoor Tagging - but I think it could be
> refined a little. Especially it doesn't allow for easy corridors placement,
> and also some definitions could be more rigorous. Last year I finished my
> thesis on the topic of Indoor mapping and also submited a pull request for
> iD editor (see zby.cz/thesis), now I created a proposal to move us little
> bit further:
> I would be glad for comments, and I hope we could make OSM the best indoor
> map ever :-)
> Pavel Zbytovský
> Tagging mailing listTagging at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging