[Tagging] fire hydrants
viking81 at tin.it
Wed Jul 5 18:06:45 UTC 2017
> * Can I or would you add an example subsection with pictures giving at least the different situations depicted with fire_hydrant:type key ?
Of course you can, Francois: any contriubution is welcome.
> With fire_hydrant:couplings, you have to guess what this means.
> Without reading the wiki, somebody can tag fire_hydrant:couplings=yes or
> fire_hydrant:couplings=2 for exemple.
> Sata will be of lower quality
> if you want to avoid a generic subname :type, I think that should be fire_hydrant:couplings_type the same with for fire_hydrant:couplings_size
What do other mappers think about this? Is fire_hydrant:couplings_type or fire_hydrant:couplings:type better? And the same question for size.
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
More information about the Tagging