[Tagging] Formally informal sidewalks
nbolten at gmail.com
Fri Jul 14 14:41:31 UTC 2017
If those two footways make up a reasonable continuing path, that's a good
case for using the unmarked crossing tagging schema. It communicates all of
the features actually being traversed (footway -> crossing the street ->
footway) and is extensible: you can easily add curb and surface information.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 7:35 AM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> sent from a phone
> On 14. Jul 2017, at 13:16, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
> But what if there are no crossings marked? Do we have to invent
> crossings then ? (e.g. near each junction)
> It is not uncommon to have such a network of sidewalks without
> People are allowed to cross everywhere then.
> I wouldn't map the sidewalks as proper footways in this case, but you
> could also "connect" them with a relation, e.g. type=area. The footways
> inside the block should connect with the road, e.g. here
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging