[Tagging] Ordering of routes, possible mapathon? Was: Re: rail routes: how are platforms and stops associated (rail question 2)

[Jo]

Hi Aun,

Do you know about JOSM's public transport assistant plugin?

Maybe we should set up a weekly online meeting, where everyone with an
interest in public transport can come to get hands on explanations and
where we can discuss these topics?

I just figured out how to do Hangouts on Air. Which CEST evening would suit
most people around here? On Tuesdays I have time starting at 20h, On
Fridays it could be earlier. Saturday or Sunday evening are fine with me as
well.

Polyglot

2017-05-14 14:18 GMT+02:00 Aun Johnsen <lists at gimnechiske.org>:

> Jo
>
> Thanks for the clarification, yeah I know that warnings in JOSM, specially
> those with Info level, often can be ignored. As I am working with lines in
> a metropolitan area with at least 7 different operators, I guess having
> tidy relations make data more easy to validate. I have until now focused on
> making master_route relations for lines with more than 1 route relation,
> but can start looking into completing all routes with a master_route as my
> work gets more completed. There is still a lot to do with more than 500
> lines + variations.
>
> Aun Johnsen
>
> > On May 12, 2017, at 18:16, tagging-request at openstreetmap.org wrote:
> >
> > Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 21:12:14 +0200
> > From: Jo <winfixit at gmail.com>
> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> >       <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Ordering of routes, possible mapathon? Was: Re:
> >       rail routes: how are platforms and stops associated (rail question
> 2)
> > Message-ID:
> >       <CAJ6DwMDovPVHrE3wVPxa66tT7_jP736fynoGBFoDRvViBEZb5w at mail.
> gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > Hi Aun,
> >
> > JOSM's validator warnings are just that, warnings. Some of them can be
> > safely ignored. Of course if the route_master relation doesn't really add
> > information, I'd say it's fine to omit it.
> >
> > Here are some examples:
> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3614368/history
> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3612781/history
> >
> > The tags on both relations are quite different. I like to have both of
> > them, because I want to compare with data from the operators and then
> it's
> > good to have all of them "behave" in the same way. The route_master to
> > describe the line, the route relations to describe the itineraries for
> all
> > the variations.
> >
> > We have a few more of those with only one route relation. For example the
> > one going in the other direction on our ring road or some school buses
> for
> > students that only go from the station to the campus on Sunday evening.
> On
> > Friday they have enough possibilities with the standard offered lines.
> >
> >
> > Polyglot
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170514/2caf4850/attachment.html>