[Tagging] Way beneath overhanging cliff
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Tue Oct 3 20:56:11 UTC 2017
On 04-Oct-17 07:39 AM, marc marc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 03. 10. 17 à 21:46, Kevin Kenny a écrit :
>> is there particular tagging that I should
>> be using where ways cross because of natural topography?
>> 'covered=yes'? Something else?
> you can/should put layer to parts of ways that don't cross
Nominally layer=0 is 'ground level'. In these situations the 'ground level' folds back on itself - so both 'layers' are nominally 0.
I have a similar situation and have simply used covered=yes.
As there are no other paths that cross there is no conflict for my situation.
The cliff line crosses the path .. but that should cause no problem (rendering, routing or?)?
More information about the Tagging
mailing list