[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v2 Vehicle Type "coach"

Mikolai-Alexander Gütschow mikolai.guetschow at t-online.de
Fri Oct 6 00:12:01 UTC 2017


Thanks Martin for your answers, please refer to the Talkpage for my 
answers: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Public_Transport_v2_Vehicle_Type_%22coach%22

Cheers!


El 05/10/17 a las 06:22, Martin Koppenhoefer escribió:
>
>
> 2017-10-05 0:09 GMT+02:00 Mikolai-Alexander Gütschow 
> <mikolai.guetschow at t-online.de <mailto:mikolai.guetschow at t-online.de>>:
>
>     Now, I've looked again at the Oxomoa scheme proposal which already
>     suggested an idea to differentiate between different bus route
>     types by using the key "bus". Are there any arguments against this
>     approach? We should only discuss possible values such as
>     long_distance or intercity, suburban, urban, school, shuttle,
>     express, train_replacement etc.
>
>
>
> the key "bus" is already used nearly a million times: 
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/bus#values 
> <https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/bus#values>
> it is used as an access tag and also to say which kind of vehicle 
> stops at a public_transport platform / stop.
> Common values are:
> "yes" 98%
> "no" 0,5%
> "designated" 0,5%
> "urban" 0,1%
> "unofficial" 0,1%
>
> I agree the values you propose can be interesting, especially 
> long_distance, train_replacement (although this is generally a 
> temporary thing for hyperactive high density mapping areas), school, 
> urban, "shuttle"
> I wouldn't suburban, but would see them included in urban
> intercity is also somehow unclear, as cities might be very close 
> together (i.e. it's kind of "urban") or very far away. "long_distance" 
> seems less ambiguous (althoug it is also relative, maybe your list 
> lacks some kind of "regional" which can be used both, in metropolitan 
> and in rural areas for "medium" distance routes).
> On the other hand, while the distinction by function (school, 
> train_replacement, shuttle, express) is not (clearly) inferrable from 
> other properties, the distance travelled and the admin entities served 
> can easily be gotten from looking at the actually route.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20171005/5ce316f8/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list