[Tagging] confusing wiki on emergency

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Single bad link on wiki is not a good reason for mass edit worldwide,
changing all editors, changing all data consumers, changing habits of all
users using this tag, introducing confusing and unusual prefix (it is not
like OSM tagging scheme requires more confusing things) and changing all
pages on wiki describing this tag.

Just fix the bad link, separate section four meaning as an access tag makes
sense.

On 30 Oct 2017 11:08 a.m., "joost schouppe" <joost.schouppe at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On the access page, there is a described use for emergency=* . However,
> when you click through, you get to a page to a tag that describes all sorts
> of amenities related to emergency.
>
> Would this be a reason to retag emergency when related to access as the
> implied tag access:emergency=*, and then make a new wiki page about
> access:emergency ? Or would it be enough to add a section to the
> emergency=* wiki page to explain that it can ALSO be used as an implied
> access:emergency tag?
>
> --
> Joost Schouppe
> OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
> Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
> <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20171031/cfd5f856/attachment.html>