[Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 96, Issue 3

[Rafael Avila Coya]

+1

And, IMHO, it would be smarter to drop shop=fashion and shop=boutique 
and incorporate it to the clothes=* tag, that has already 
clothes=children, clothes=women, etc. So if you have a shop that is 
"fashion" and women only, you could tag it as

shop=clothes
clothes=women;fashion

As for shop=boutique, it's crystal clear that it's making more harm than 
good. You only have to do an overpass over different cities in 
francophone Africa and you will see the mess...

Cheers,

Rafael.

On 01/09/17 19:13, Severin Menard wrote:
> 
>     Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 12:48:25 +0200
>     From: Jean-Marc Liotier <jm at liotier.org <mailto:jm at liotier.org>>
>     To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>              <tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:tagging at openstreetmap.org>>
>     Subject: Re: [Tagging] shop=fashion shop=boutique
>     Message-ID: <20170901124825.7671647c at manantali.encara.local.ads>
>     Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> 
>     I still don't understand the need for anything other than shop=clothes
>     used with assorted modifiers. Fashion is subjective and I do not see
>     why exclusive distribution channels should be tagged differently as
>     they are essentially clothes shop with no price tags and an attitude.
> 
>     shop=car covers both the average Volskwagen dealership and the workshop
>     that sells handmade locally built overpriced exotics with golden urinal
>     that you never heard of. Why should it be different for clothes ?
> 
> 
> +1
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>