[Tagging] Elevation in Feet as part of Peak Names

marc marc marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com
Fri Sep 8 10:12:10 UTC 2017


Le 08. 09. 17 à 11:14, Janko Mihelić a écrit :
> 20155.9894568543 ft

your unreasonable example has nothing to do with elevation.
in any tag, nothing prevents a tool from being rational
in the values it saves or displays. I do not know what is
the best possible accuracy but an altitude measurement
rounded to 0.1 meter or 0.5 feet seems IMHO reasonable.
I have never seen a sign with more precise information.

you can even put a measure 10 times more accurate,
this will remain very far from your example but still
allowing to find a round number after conversion.


More information about the Tagging mailing list