[Tagging] Mapping hotels on buildings or areas around buildings

[LeTopographeFou]

> This is how iD interprets the tag - as a building outline.

I disagree, when you look for "Hotel" iD proposes both "Hotel" (in gray 
which means it is an area in the iD codes) and "Building Hotel" (in red 
and with a building picture which both means it is a building). Same for 
Hospitals. For me iD is already ready.

But one may propose a new translation to replace "Hotel" by "Hotel 
Grounds" to be consistent with how hospitals are proposed in iD.

By the way this is how I tag hotels now so +1 with the proposal.

Yours,

LeTopographeFou

Le 29/09/2017 à 16:50, Bryan Housel a écrit :
> Yes, but the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel 
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=hotel> page says
> "Set a node <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Node> or draw as an 
> area <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area> along the building 
> outline."
>
> This is how iD interprets the tag - as a building outline.
>
> So if we collectively decide to change `tourism=*` tags to be property 
> outlines (like hospitals and schools),
>
> I hope:
> - somebody opens an issue on iD to let me know to change the wording 
> of the preset.
> - somebody creates a challenge to cleanup the existing data that is 
> not tagged this way.
> - somebody fixes the wiki (well somebody should do this anyway as it 
> currently says 2 different things)
>
>
> Thanks, Bryan
>
>
>
>> On Sep 29, 2017, at 10:32 AM, Michal Fabík <michal.fabik at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:michal.fabik at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Janko Mihelić <janjko at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:janjko at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> should only the hotel buildings be tagged with tourism=hotel or the 
>>> whole
>>> area that is owned by the hotel?
>>>
>>> I think if the hotel doesn't have more than one building, and if the 
>>> hotel
>>> grounds are not very big, or if they are accessible by public, only the
>>> building gets tagged. But if there are more buildings, outside pool 
>>> and/or
>>> parks accesible only by guests, we might consider tagging an area around
>>> those buildings.
>>>
>>> Does this thinking align with most mappers?
>>
>> Hi,
>> I don't recall the last time I tagged a hotel but that's how I would
>> to it. Actually, the wiki page for buildings confirms this:
>> building=hotel: "A building designed with separate rooms available for
>> overnight accommodation. Normally used in conjunction with
>> tourism=hotel for the hotel grounds including recreation areas and
>> parking." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building#Values)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -- 
>> Michal Fabík
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170929/7747894f/attachment-0001.html>