[Tagging] Flower fields as tourism attraction

Dave Swarthout daveswarthout at gmail.com
Mon Apr 9 11:47:15 UTC 2018


But we're not talking about either farmland or a crop in this case. The
flowers (or flowerbed, if you prefer) I'm talking about is actually a
tourist attraction and is maintained for that purpose.

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 6:38 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

> 2018-04-09 13:08 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com>:
>
>> On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 01:50:50 +0000
>> Dave Swarthout <daveswarthout at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > How about
>> > tourism=attraction
>> > attraction=flowers
>>
>> I think that man_made=flowerbed + tourism=attraction would be
>> preferable, it would allow tagging also flower fields that are not a
>> tourism attraction at all.
>>
>>
>
> +1, I would also prefer not creating a category for attractions which
> would then be defined as what they are by subtags, because everything can
> happen to be an attraction and it would ultimately lead to double tagging
> everything, an attraction version and not.
>
> For the flower field, maybe landuse=farmland with crop=* could also be an
> option?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>



-- 
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180409/30fdd9c8/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list