[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carpet hanger
t.pfeifer at computer.org
Tue Apr 10 07:49:04 UTC 2018
Again I agree with Warin, man_made suits better since it is more specific and avoids the crowded
On 10.04.2018 09:03, Warin wrote:
> Don't be too hasty.
> There may be others who disagree.
> On 10/04/18 15:52, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>> I see no meaningful difference between amenity=carpet_hanger and
>> man_made=carpet_hanger so I changed proposal to man_made=carpet_hanger
>> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:57:55 +1000
>> Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> man_made would be a more specific key and avoids excluding ones that
>>> are not for the community, e.g. a commercial enterprise.
>>> man_made "for identifying man-made/(artificial)/ structures added to
>>> the landscape" amenity "an assortment of community facilities"
>>> On 10/04/18 14:37, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>>>> carpet hanger (also carpet stand or carpet rack) is a construction
>>>> to hang carpets for cleaning with the help of carpet beaters.
>>>> Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpet_hanger
>>>> Currently there is no documented tagging scheme for this feature. At
>>>> this moment amenity=beater is typically used, but it seems poor tag
>>>> name, not matching English name for this feature.
>>>> the proposal page:
More information about the Tagging