[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carpet hanger
osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au
osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au
Tue Apr 10 08:43:03 UTC 2018
I would be willing to argue that there is a place for both keys actually.
The man_made one to describe the physical thing.
The amenity one to describe that this is a publicly accessible amenity..
The amenity key implies the man_made key, but not the other way around.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 April 2018 18:05
> To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
> <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carpet hanger
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 10. Apr 2018, at 09:49, Tom Pfeifer <t.pfeifer at computer.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > avoids the crowded amenity key.
>
>
>
> To me, both, man_made and amenity, would be ok, but I don’t
> understand the argument of the “crowded” amenity key. Is there a
> limit of values for a key? What are the potential problems of a
> “crowded” key?
> I could understand that amenity is about amenities for everyone,
> while a place to beat carpets often might be semi-private (shared
> by the people of a condominium, etc), which could be an argument
> for man_made.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
More information about the Tagging
mailing list