[Tagging] Small gate only for foot access

osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au
Fri Apr 20 10:26:37 UTC 2018


I believe the correct shorthand for access=no foot=yes would be just access=foot ?

 

From: Adam Snape <adam.c.snape at gmail.com> 
Sent: Friday, 20 April 2018 19:17
To: e.rossini73 at alice.it; Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Small gate only for foot access

 

Hi, 

Is it a kissing gate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dkissing_gate if so that specific tag is more appropriate than a generic gate.

The access tags for foot only would be access=no, foot=yes

In practice almost all gates (that aren't kissing gates) are physically big enough for bikes etc. as well , so I'd suggest foot=yes motorcar=no. If the path is only a right of way on foot then this can be implied by the class of highway eg. highway=footway or explicitly tagged eg. highway=path; foot=yes, bicycle=no, horse=no, motor_vehicle=no, 

Kind  regards,

Adam

 

On 20 April 2018 at 09:32, e.rossini73 at alice.it <mailto:e.rossini73 at alice.it>  <e.rossini73 at alice.it <mailto:e.rossini73 at alice.it> > wrote:

Hi, excuse me, how can I correctly tag a small gate only for foot access?

barrier=gate and then which other tag can I use?

Thanks very much.

--enrico



_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org> 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180420/7a7e6463/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list