[Tagging] Small gate only for foot access
osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au
osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au
Fri Apr 20 10:26:37 UTC 2018
I believe the correct shorthand for access=no foot=yes would be just access=foot ?
From: Adam Snape <adam.c.snape at gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, 20 April 2018 19:17
To: e.rossini73 at alice.it; Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Small gate only for foot access
Hi,
Is it a kissing gate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dkissing_gate if so that specific tag is more appropriate than a generic gate.
The access tags for foot only would be access=no, foot=yes
In practice almost all gates (that aren't kissing gates) are physically big enough for bikes etc. as well , so I'd suggest foot=yes motorcar=no. If the path is only a right of way on foot then this can be implied by the class of highway eg. highway=footway or explicitly tagged eg. highway=path; foot=yes, bicycle=no, horse=no, motor_vehicle=no,
Kind regards,
Adam
On 20 April 2018 at 09:32, e.rossini73 at alice.it <mailto:e.rossini73 at alice.it> <e.rossini73 at alice.it <mailto:e.rossini73 at alice.it> > wrote:
Hi, excuse me, how can I correctly tag a small gate only for foot access?
barrier=gate and then which other tag can I use?
Thanks very much.
--enrico
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180420/7a7e6463/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list