[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Line clamps
pla16021 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 2 12:17:14 UTC 2018
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 12:49 AM, François Lacombe <fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com
> Indeed there are situations where many kind of clamping is used. I think
> about line_clamp=mixed
> Especially for such poles : https://previews.123rf.com/
Yeah, all you could do with that one is line_clamp=mixed. The down/up/down
situation you could maybe handle as
Insulators are a particular practical mean to do so especially for power
> where conductors have to be separated from their supports as to prevent
> electricity to go back to earth.
> You don't have insulator here : https://wiki.openstreetmap.
> But it a suspension clamping.
That's true. Insulated cable, so the attachment isn't an insulator.
The main point is to remove power dedicated values from tower:type.
As it's better to make it global, such values are extended to portals,
> And to make it an order more global, let's not design it specific to power
> anymore but suitable for telecom or any other line
> That's how line_clamp came to my mind.
> Should I update the proposal and rationale chapter?
Maybe. Or maybe you need different terminology. How about
"line_attachment" rather than line_clamp?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging