[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Line clamps
pla16021 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 3 13:34:04 UTC 2018
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:58 AM, François Lacombe <fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com
> Hi Paul,
> 2018-08-02 14:17 GMT+02:00 Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com>:
>> Yeah, all you could do with that one is line_clamp=mixed. The
>> down/up/down situation you could maybe handle as
> Good point. It would be pretty easy to describe complex configurations as
> matrix. I've started a chapter dealing with complex configurations
The documentation is a little unclear. What I think you may mean (because
it doesn't lose information if you
do it this way) isline_clamp:1 is the top row, and you might have
line_clamp:1=suspension;pin;suspension. If that is
what you mean then an example would help clarify.
> Maybe. Or maybe you need different terminology. How about
>> "line_attachment" rather than line_clamp?
> Good idea, line_attachment sounds good.
> Is it British English?
It is Brtish *layman's* English. It would be a good idea to check with
somebody who works in the industry. But I suspect
he or she will tell you it's an insulator. In British layman's English,
attachment is better than clamp. I'll see if I can get
an answer out of somebody with a youtube channel who works with this stuff
(don't hold your breath).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging