[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Line clamps

Paul Allen pla16021 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 3 13:34:04 UTC 2018


On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Fran├žois Lacombe <fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> 2018-08-02 14:17 GMT+02:00 Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com>:
>
>> Yeah, all you could do with that one is line_clamp=mixed.  The
>> down/up/down situation you could maybe handle as
>> line_clamp=suspension;pin;suspension.
>>
>
> Good point. It would be pretty easy to describe complex configurations as
> matrix. I've started a chapter dealing with complex configurations
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/
> Lines_clamps#Complex_configurations
>

The documentation is a little unclear.  What I think you may mean (because
it doesn't lose information if you
do it this way) isline_clamp:1 is the top row, and you might have
line_clamp:1=suspension;pin;suspension.  If that is
what you mean then an example would help clarify.

>
> Maybe.  Or maybe you need different terminology.  How about
>> "line_attachment" rather than line_clamp?
>>
>
> Good idea, line_attachment sounds good.
> Is it British English?
>

It is Brtish *layman's* English.  It would be a good idea to check with
somebody who works in the industry.  But I suspect
he or she will tell you it's an insulator.  In British layman's English,
attachment is better than clamp.  I'll see if I can get
an answer out of somebody with a youtube channel who works with this stuff
(don't hold your breath).

-- 
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180803/022a9a59/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list