[Tagging] place nodes for continents?

althio althio.forum at gmail.com
Tue Aug 7 08:32:14 UTC 2018

I agree this position is debatable and finally arbitrary.
And I find this particular position (for North America node) rather
strange, it feels too much North, as if it was biased for Mercator
projection maybe.

As arbitrary as it is, we could accept by definition something like

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 10:21 Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> On 07.08.2018 10:04, Ilya Zverev wrote:
> > It is a strange question, which can be applied to virtually anything in
> > OSM. Potholes — are they useful?
> Ok, I'll re-word:
> How is a continent node verifiable, especially with regards to its
> position? What is our plan if two people should start edit-warring about
> whether the continent node should be at 51.0000002, -109.0000002 (as it
> currently is), or rather at 51,-109 or at 50,-108?
> Representing a tree or a pothole with a node is not exact either, but
> it's more or less within the accuracy of our available measurement
> devices. Representing a city with a node is much less accurate, but
> people seem to agree for most cities, placing the city node in the heart
> of the old city, or where the city hall is, or some such.
> Do we really want to approximate whole continents with a point, and if
> we do, where is that point to be placed?
> Bye
> Frederik
> --
> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180807/4b91e3b0/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list