[Tagging] Points instead of areas

Graeme Fitzpatrick graemefitz1 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 7 22:41:08 UTC 2018

On 7 August 2018 at 21:56, Daniel Koć <daniel at koć.pl> wrote:

> For example nobody would say that a city is a point

I'm not disagreeing with you, but people do refer to them, & somehow even
measure them, as points!

I'm sure that you have the same situation in your country but an e.g. is my
State capital, Brisbane: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brisbane, which

covers an area of 15842 km2, but is still apparently found exactly at:


   - 732 km (455 mi) N of Sydney <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney>[3]
   - 945 km (587 mi) NNE of Canberra
   - 1,374 km (854 mi) NNE of Melbourne
   - 1,600 km (994 mi) NE of Adelaide
   - 3,604 km (2,239 mi) NE of Perth <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perth>
   [7] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brisbane#cite_note-7>

The Dept of Main Roads also agrees that there is a defined point known as
Brisbane! https://goo.gl/images/FbTLCt

(I believe that, once upon a time, Main Roads measurements were taken to
the Post Office as being the centre of each town?)

OSM also shows it at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/-27.4917/153.0325,
which has the City tag located in / on the centre of Brisbane City Hall.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180808/aafb56e7/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list