[Tagging] undersea tourist route
lionel.giard at gmail.com
Wed Aug 8 12:43:55 UTC 2018
I also agree with the location tag as it say it is underwater, while the
other method say that the path is made of "water" (as it would be made of
gravel or asphalt in other places).
Note that the tag layer=-1 don't mean anything by itself (if there is no
other data at the same location) as it is a relative tag (layer -1 means
below other element with layer 0 or above). And as you are not below the
water but in it, you can't technically use that to indicate underwater
element. One example of feature below the water is the "Channel Tunnel"
between France and England, where it is technically in the rocks below the
sea, that's not the same thing that you want here. :-)
2018-08-08 11:18 GMT+02:00 Javier Sánchez Portero <javiersanp at gmail.com>:
> I think that location=underwater is more exact that surface=water. With
> the second I expect to walk over the water like Jesus.
> El mié., 8 ago. 2018 a las 1:13, Warin (<61sundowner at gmail.com>) escribió:
>> On 08/08/18 09:01, marc marc wrote:
>> > Le 08. 08. 18 à 00:26, Warin a écrit :
>> >> A scuba or snorkel route - some concrete drums with a chain between
>> >> and signs for people to follow. Like an under sea path.
>> > highway=path + location=underwater ? :)
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging