[Tagging] Fwd: Missing access value (access=license / authorization?)

Andrew Davidson theswavu at gmail.com
Sun Aug 12 22:38:44 UTC 2018

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Consider a bridge which is structurally strong enough for pedestrians,
> cyclists and maybe even horses but which would
> collapse if a vehicle drove over it.  The distinction between "private"
> and "no" for vehicles then becomes clear.  Even the
> owner would not drive a vehicle over it.

The access tag is for indicating legal restrictions applying to passage. If
a bridge has physical limits but no legal impediment then they need to be
tagged using some other key: maxwidth:physical , maxheight:physical, and
maxweight:physical might be candidates.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180813/304d7cdc/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list