[Tagging] Stolpersteine tagging scheme problem
Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sat Aug 25 17:05:15 UTC 2018
sent from a phone
> On 25. Aug 2018, at 15:46, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [lutz]
>> Thanks. He has already responded in this thread as the one who has chosen historic=memorial + memorial=plaque + plaque=stolperstein (as opposed to 4 others who prefer historic=memorial + memorial=stolperstein):
>
>
> Since lutz is the main driving force behind heritage=* and historic=* and related tagging, his opinion is informed.
there is no definition for the plaque tag and I am not able to deduct a system by looking at the values:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/plaque#values
Most used value is “metal” which would fit for a stolperstein as it is quite unspecific. (no plaque=stolperstein yet). metal=stolperstein??? Would mean we would have to add 4 tags for a stolperstein, as opposed to the current alternatives each with 2 tags:
historic=memorial
memorial=plaque
plaque=metal
metal=stolperstein
-1
Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180825/a0d17b84/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list