[Tagging] Tagging suggestions for electricity
61sundowner at gmail.com
Fri Aug 31 07:57:49 UTC 2018
Here there is the company that I buy my electricity from. They buy it
from the distribution network that I am connected to.
So I can have a choice of who I buy from .. but my network does not change.
I am not certain if these firms buy it directly from the network .. or
some other body that then sees to the network and the power generators
as separate things.
On 31/08/18 17:43, seirra wrote:
> just something to mention about distribution companies here anyway, we
> have the network, then we have the company? so for example my network
> is UK power network, but my company is utilita? however in other areas
> (still in the uk) they would have a different network altogether
> On 08/31/18 05:47, Dolly Andriatsiferana wrote:
>> I think this would be hard to maintain, and highly redundant
>> since voltage won't change for a given city or even country.
>> Think about standards names to fill utilities:electricity.
>> Each standard comes with frequency, voltage, rating...
>> Yes, I agree that in most cases voltage doesn't change much for a
>> given city. But something that will change frequently is the source
>> (here in Madagascar mostly from a distribution company, a generator,
>> or individual solar panels).
>> And maybe another good idea is to omit those voltage and possibly
>> redundant details, and put sources directly as values on the main tag
>> (like how most of the few existing electricity=* tags seem to be
>> used). So we would have something like:
>> * utility:electricity=yes - there is electricity feeding the
>> building but the source is not defined
>> * utility:electricity=no - there is no electricity source at all
>> * utility:electricity=generator/company/solar/windmill... - there
>> is electricity and the source is known
>> 2018-08-31 1:47 GMT+03:00 Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com
>> <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>>:
>> On 31/08/18 05:20, François Lacombe wrote:
>>> Le jeu. 30 août 2018 à 19:12, Dolly Andriatsiferana
>>> <privatemajory at gmail.com <mailto:privatemajory at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>> I like the idea of keeping a namespace gathering utilities
>>> such as electricity, gas, internet or other. But the idea is
>>> also to be able to use a namespace for the utility to
>>> provide more details (source, voltage, fee...) or conditions
>>> (if there's schedule in availability) - and with
>>> *utility:electricity* this would easily generate a complex
>>> tagging of namespace under namespace, unless you say it is
>>> no problem to have *utility:electricity:voltage=** for example.
>>> I think this would be hard to maintain, and highly redundant
>>> since voltage won't change for a given city or even country.
>> Most hoses in Australia have 240 v single phase supplied to them.
>> Then they have 'standard' (here) GPOs of 10 Amp capacity. Some
>> have one or more higher 15 Amp capacity outlets.
>> And then there are some houses that have 3 phase 415v supplied to
>> them - and they have 'standard' (here) GPOs of 10 Amp capacity,
>> possibly one or more 15 Amp capacity outlets and one or more 3
>> phase outlets.
>> So here you have in one neighbourhood 3 different instances of
>> electricity presence in houses.
>>> Agreed with Paul statement about earthing system which is
>>> specific to each building
>> Earthing systems are usually mandated and common to some
>> bureaucratic boundaries.
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging