[Tagging] Tourism=attraction: feature or secondary tag?

Yves yvecai at mailbox.org
Fri Dec 7 07:36:22 UTC 2018



Le 7 décembre 2018 08:24:33 GMT+01:00, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> a écrit :
>On 07/12/18 16:09, Yves wrote:
>>
>> Le 6 décembre 2018 23:05:48 GMT+01:00, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com>
>a écrit :
>>> On 07/12/18 06:49, Mark Wagner wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 17:54:44 +0100
>>>> Rory McCann <rory at technomancy.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 06/12/2018 08:38, Mark Wagner wrote:
>>>>>> Yellowstone National Park has attracted a fair few bare
>>>>>> "tourism=attraction" objects.  How would you tag the following:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Boiling River and Firehole Swimming Area, naturally-heated
>>>>>> stretches of river that are popular for swimming.
>>>>> natural=water + leisure=swimming_area ? natural=water +
>>>>> sport=swimming ?
>>>> Seems reasonable.
>>>   Except for sport. Sport implies competition, are there marked
>lanes
>>> for this competition? I'd think not. So I would leave sport out of
>it.
>>>
>> Sport key for competition or leisure, IMHO.
>
>For leisure - swimming requires no marked lines etc (other than a pool
>of water).
>So it has no specific infrastructure .. meaning it should not be in
>OSM?
>

OSM being OSM, you can't avoid a "swimming" tag to be added by a contributor one day or another to any piece of water he/she like to use for practice. 



More information about the Tagging mailing list