[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Top up

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 26. Dec 2018, at 15:08, Stefan Keller <sfkeller at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Tag-proposals in the form
> <tag_attr_name>:<type_value->[:<subtype_value>]=yes/no should be
> avoided. It's shifting values to attribute names!


it’s not a value, it‘s a property ;-)
it depends on your interpretation, e.g. motorroad=yes 
oneway=yes

aren’t these values and we should tag them 
road_restrictions=motorroad;oneway?


top_up:phone=yes
means: provides phone top up.
For practical reason, I would expect a scheme 
characteristic_I_need_to_know=yes/no

much easier to evaluate than one like:
some_services=foo;characteristic_I_need_to_know;bar


Cheers, Martin