[Tagging] Proposed features - RFC 2 - Pressurized waterways
61sundowner at gmail.com
Thu Feb 15 02:47:16 UTC 2018
On 15-Feb-18 08:41 AM, François Lacombe wrote:
> 2018-02-14 22:20 GMT+01:00 Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com
> <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>>:
> If this is dual tagged with man_made=pipeline then it would be
> better as a property tag as Martin suggests.
> What do you mean with "dual tagged" ?
Having two main tags... when it is pipe and tagged man_made=pipeline
the suggestion/proposal is to add an additional main tag waterway=*
Getting tired of searching for the proposal .. here is a link ..
> In this way the pipeline tag can also use the property
> 'pressurised' .. and that property could be expanded to include
> The tag pressure=* is here for that, the value can be given in bar
> This is pretty easy to get this value for a penstock : pressure =
> (elev up - elev down) / 10 in bar
Are all of these these proposed waterway=pressurised in pipes?
You can gather I find the proposal confusing...
Talk of canals and .. they are not part of this?
If these are all pipes .. then waterway=pipe would be a good
description, use pressure=* as a tag for the pressure.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging