[Tagging] tagging for decaying features

[Javier Sánchez Portero]

2018-01-04 3:05 GMT+00:00 Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+osm at gmail.com>:

> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+osm at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> By contrast, adding 'historic' and adjusting tagging to current use
>> is already a common practice among those who fix repurposed
>> features from the GNIS import. I didn't invent it.
>>
>>
> Oh, and I oughtn't have needed to, but I just checked, and at least
> one of the buildings in question is on the National Register of Historic
> Places.  I'm guessing that in itself will not satisfy Warin as to its
> 'historic' nature, but I'm not sure what authority or combination of
> authorities would.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
Hello

As it is included in a register for historic place, I suggest to use the
Key:heritage [1]. Where I live, the heritage is defined by law as any thing
with *historical*, architectural, artistic, archaeological, ethnographic,
palaeontological, scientific or technical interest.

building=detached
heritage:building=school

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage
Regards, Javier
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180104/81dd2d5c/attachment.html>