[Tagging] route/forward/backward members in all types of routes
Fernando Trebien
fernando.trebien at gmail.com
Tue Jan 9 18:12:41 UTC 2018
It seems like other people have faced this problem before [1]. The link
provided by JOSM developers refers to the text in the proposal, not to the
main article [3] nor the more specific route type articles.
[1] https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/13768
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Fernando Trebien <fernando.trebien at gmail.com
> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 11:13 AM, Tijmen Stam <mailinglists at iivq.net>
> wrote:
> > In PTv2 only a few roles are acceptable: stop and platform (and the
> > equivalents stop_exit_only and stop_entry_only) for stops and platforms,
> > and _no role_ for the ways in the route.
>
> In that case, the article on route relations [1] should be updated to
> state that forward and backward roles are not always acceptable, and
> that the user should read the article on the more specific route type
> to know whether it is acceptable or not.
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Members
>
> --
> Fernando Trebien
> +55 (51) 9962-5409
>
> "Nullius in verba."
>
--
Fernando Trebien
+55 (51) 9962-5409
"Nullius in verba."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180109/44262b87/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list