[Tagging] Urbex

[OSMDoudou]

I don't read them asking to remove routes from maps.

 

What catches my eye in the article is they ask to "remove our side streets from their algorithms and not offer them as recommendations".

 

So, it's a matter of municipalities putting the right signs in the field (e.g. destination only -- which they need to do anyway to fine abusive cut-through), tagging the map accordingly (local OSM mappers will happily do that) and the routing engine will simply gently abide.

 

 

From: Kevin Kenny [mailto:kevin.b.kenny+osm at gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 03:41
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Urbex

 

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2018-January/018279.html

 

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk <mailto:andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> > wrote:

On 8 January 2018 at 23:39, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+osm at gmail.com <mailto:kevin.b.kenny%2Bosm at gmail.com> > wrote:

> Witness municipalities asking us to remove their
> streets from the map

When & where did that happen?

[off-topic for the tagging list, so please feel free to point me to an
alternative venue]

--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org> 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180110/c26b6bad/attachment.html>