[Tagging] route/forward/backward members in all types of routes

[Warin]

On 11-Jan-18 12:58 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>
>
> On 11/01/18 06:30, Tijmen Stam wrote:
>> On 10-01-18 11:37, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>>> Yeap, that would be an edge case. Guess no-one thought that you 
>>> could have an entire route that is only one way. 
>>
>> I don't see why this is a problem.
>
> This thread is getting quite long. To recap, the problem is that if 
> your PTv2 route consists of only one way there is no way to tell in 
> which direction it runs without providing more information.
Break the single way into 2 ways...
Or use the order of  'stops' .. they should be ordered from start to 
finish. If a circular route then start and finish can be the same.
>
>
>>
>>> The solution would be either:
>>>
>>> 1. Put in at least two stops/platforms.
>> Which you need to do anyway. 
>
> Actually you don't. The stop/platforms are only "recommended if 
> available".
>
> In fact a valid PTv2 route can be just a relation with:
>
> type=route
> route=train/.../ferry
>
> and a single way. Everything else is recommended or optional.
Then there would be no method of getting on or off .. you need some 
'stops'.