[Tagging] route role on cycle routes

Jo winfixit at gmail.com
Thu Jan 11 19:30:41 UTC 2018


I fail to understand what information the route role is supposed to add.

I never needed a link role  in bicycle or hiking route relations, it seems
something to use on route=road relations.

Polyglot

2018-01-11 19:35 GMT+01:00 Fernando Trebien <fernando.trebien at gmail.com>:

> The validator also issues a warning when using the link role on cycle
> routes. The role is defined on the main article [2] but not mentioned
> on the more specific article [3].
>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Fernando Trebien
> <fernando.trebien at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Iterating on the previous related discussion [1], I've noticed that,
> > though the main article on route relations [2] claims that the route
> > role can be used, the article on cycle routes [3] seems to suggest
> > that such role should not be used. JOSM issues a warning if it is
> > used, and most routes I'm seeing mapped do not have that role.
> >
> > Should we edit the wiki to explicitly advise against using that role
> > on cycle routes?
> >
> > [1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-
> January/034587.html
> > [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Members
> > [3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dbicycle
> >
> > --
> > Fernando Trebien
> > +55 (51) 9962-5409
> >
> > "Nullius in verba."
>
>
>
> --
> Fernando Trebien
> +55 (51) 9962-5409
>
> "Nullius in verba."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180111/5f21fe1f/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list