[Tagging] Water source types
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Fri Jan 12 20:24:55 UTC 2018
On 13-Jan-18 05:07 AM, Cez jod wrote:
> Hi!
> "amenity=drinking_water works for me" it's ok for me too
> amenity=drinking_water it is a very good, universal, proven and needed
> tag.
> I wondered if it was possible to determine the quality of the water
> more accurately. It looks like with drinking_water=yes/no/boil/ ... is
> an indispensable tag, widely used, easy to use and used by many app.
>
> I can not understand the introduction of the amenity=water_point tag.
> Was not better to add water_point=yes/.?
> e.g.
> amenity=drinking_water
> drinking_water=yes
> water_point=yes
>
> I do not understand what's different in water_point from
> amenity_drnking at the moment I think it's 100% synonymous.
Amenity= drinking_water is non specific. It does not tell me if I can
drink directly from it (I can from a man_made=drinking_fountain), fill a
water bottle without trouble (I can from a man_made=tag,
drinking_water=yes), fill a caravan water tank (I and from a
amenity=water_point) .. etc etc. People did not want to add subtags to
amenity=drinking_water as you have done because some of these features
have sings that say drinking_water=no, to have a feature with
amenity=drinking_water, drinking_water=no is not good! .
More information about the Tagging
mailing list