[Tagging] Proposed features - Voting - Pressurized waterways

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Tue Jan 23 13:43:47 UTC 2018


2018-01-23 14:25 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com>:

> As data consumer I would prefer to have general tags - for example, in my
> data processing I would prefer to have
> spillways mapped as waterway=canal + intermittent=yes rather than
> waterway=spillway.
>


or maybe waterway:function / waterway:subtype=spillway ? This way the
spillway function is not tied to the waterway size, as it would be with
canal=spillway.
While intermittent=yes is somehow true, I guess spillways aren't the only
reason for a canal to be intermittent.



>
> Also I would prefer waterway=canal + pressurised=yes + tunnel=* rather
> than waterway=pressurised.
>
>

+1 for this, as I can imagine pressurised waterways appearing in any size,
so making pressurised an attribute could make sense.


Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180123/5c682093/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list