[Tagging] waterway=fish_pass consistency

Yves yvecai at mailbox.org
Thu Jul 19 09:16:57 UTC 2018

You'd be *very* surprised what shapes fish passes can take.
I don't think it's a good idea to use the waterway key to tell that whatever feature is intended to be a fish pass. 
This one, although man made is definitely a river, that was built as 1) a fish pass, 2} a whitewater course. 

Le 19 juillet 2018 10:43:23 GMT+02:00, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> a écrit :
>sent from a phone
>> On 19. Jul 2018, at 10:22, Javier Sánchez Portero
><javiersanp at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Could a fish pass look like a short and very narrow canal like the
>images in this pages?
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levada
>> https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acequia
>it is not so much about what it looks like, but about the purpose it
>was built for. Are fishes using those canals?
>Often (?) they might provide kind a steps so greater heights can be
>wikipedia has a lot of examples as well:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180719/1a352013/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list