[Tagging] waterway=fish_pass consistency

ael law_ence.dev at ntlworld.com
Thu Jul 19 11:27:40 UTC 2018

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 08:57:28AM +0100, Javier Sánchez Portero wrote:
> Hello
> I personally prefer a few main values in the waterway to define the general
> cases and subtags for specific cases like this, of the type of usage =
> fiss_pass. If I am in front of an infrastructure of this type, its physical
> characteristics will allow me to distinguish if it is a channel, ditch or
> brook. If it was built for the purpose of fish passing it is a separate
> issue. Are a fish_pass different in nature to any other waterway? Waterway
> different in it's construction nature could be used as a fish_pass?

A fish pass near me is quite different to any other sort of waterway:
the nearest 'usage' might be a spillway. But what is the main tag?


More information about the Tagging mailing list