[Tagging] The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag
ajt1047 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 6 16:06:09 UTC 2018
On 06/06/2018 16:38, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> 6. Jun 2018 17:10 by kevin.b.kenny+osm at gmail.com
> <mailto:kevin.b.kenny+osm at gmail.com>:
> Nothing really fits "This land is used for production of forest
> So be tag should be invented by someone who cares about it.
I've used https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=forestry for
that, but almost no-one uses that (literally in single figures). See
e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370079612 and
for an example rendering. If there's a better tagging option that
doesn't conflict with what's in OSM already I'm happy to be enlightened.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging