[Tagging] I can't support transit:lanes

[Jo]

Name should indeed be changed, but I'd go for lanes:transition...., so it
groups with the other lanes related tags. Not sure if that is a good type
for the relation though.

There is no need to bother the user, in case there is an adjacent way with
this tag. Then it's obvious which part of the split off way should either
remain in the relation or keep the tag.

In case there is no adjacent way with that tag, or the relation contains 2
ways which don't connect, a validation error should be shown.

Polyglot

Op ma 11 jun. 2018 om 08:07 schreef Mateusz Konieczny <
matkoniecz at tutanota.com>:

> For JOSM see https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/11054
>
> 11. Jun 2018 06:42 by bhousel at gmail.com:
>
> I’m not going to add a special rule in iD to warn people if they are
> splitting a way with a lane transition tag.  I don’t want to speak for the
> JOSM devs, but I doubt they would implement something like this either.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180611/4e4de3a5/attachment.html>