[Tagging] The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Jun 11 22:35:58 UTC 2018

sent from a phone

> On 8. Jun 2018, at 17:32, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+osm at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there 'correct' tagging for these areas, which are widespread in the areas that I map and are important to the public?

there are 2 competing tags, leisure=nature_reserve and boundary protected area for this kind of object. None of them states it is named after a forest, or mainly covered by forest. Maybe this could become an additional property, e.g. for protected_area objects?


More information about the Tagging mailing list