[Tagging] The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Jun 11 22:41:29 UTC 2018



sent from a phone

> On 9. Jun 2018, at 15:53, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Landuse=forest could mean a group of trees which are not
> consistently used by a single organization for anything (and often called "Xyz Forest"


interesting, can you give a real world example where a group of trees has actually the name “... forest”? I always thought a forest would require more trees.


Cheers,
Martin


More information about the Tagging mailing list